The results of the psychological analysis of the text:
Dear L.L.!
The text of your friend (acquaintance) or patient O is strongly oriented towards some specific reader, which is either you or the person who is trying to influence her, perhaps conducting psychotherapeutic sessions with her.
O is a suggestible person, she tends not to impose her own, but to adapt to the interlocutor, in particular, to use the words he said in her answers. Its text, for example, begins with a repetition of the wording of the assigned task ( For me, as a person, the most important thing is...). The combination of one's own and others' fragments creates the impression or image of a “half-nun-half-harlot”, which, like any image, has a distant relation to reality.
And further in the text, especially at the beginning of phrases, O uses other people's words. Alien words are usually terminology and scientific expressions, often from the lexicon of a psychologist ( I am prone to constant introspection ... But outwardly I show emotions ... Pathologically I cannot ...). Her own speech, on the contrary, is colloquial, contains spelling errors that appear under the influence of vernacular, it contains childish expressions ( from father and nya, with self l childhood /small/, in general her with people, I accept myself in this form, staying ... in seb I ).
O confuses the spiritual and the spiritual (spirit and soul). Her problems, indeed, are connected with mental movements and are the responsibility of a specialist in the soul (psychologist). Faith and spirituality are understood O incorrectly ( a state of spiritual search and self-centeredness) and illiterate ( my spiritual search is connected with “seeking God”). Apparently, religion attracts her as an opportunity for communication and submission to authority. And it may well fall under the influence of more or less persistent sectarians (which you, LL, apparently, rightly fear).
Apparently, her main problem is loneliness, lack of communication and emotional contacts ( I try to enjoy everything that comes my way). There may be some delay in the development of the emotional sphere. At least O is prone to purely childish manifestations ( I love to get involved in everything new ..., with pleasure I ... understand the whole gamut of sensations from despair to insane joy).
Most likely, O concentrates too much on his experiences ( being constantly in myself, I am not attentive to others). Like a child, is over-influenced by a source of emotion ( I act according to not a thoughtful decision, but spontaneously and based on momentary sensations, intuition) and is not capable of sober assessments ( Sensitive, but not touchy. Moderately irresponsible and unscrupulous). The examples given mainly contain not O's self-assessments, but assessments of those around her (someone else's speech), who, apparently, are trying to educate her, and whose words she obediently (in the form of repentance) repeats.
The trouble is that the assessments of others for O - as for a child - are more important and significant than their own ideas:
Pathologically, I cannot (or am afraid that it looks like this from the outside) “pressure” (influence) others.
But their educational influence does not bring resolution of problems. Leads not to success or “correction”, but to repentance, apologies and unjustified low self-esteem ( I'm a completely aimless being). The need for emotional contact seems to be stronger.
Dear L.L.! Apparently, you should not reproach your girlfriend for frivolity and unwillingness (-ability) to defend their interests. Most likely, she is no less touchy than others, but she is more embarrassed than others to demonstrate and discuss her grievances. It is in this case that she probably withdraws into herself and refuses to communicate ( Since childhood, I prefer a “hermit” lifestyle… I need a lot of time to be with myself).
You are right when you say that she gives the impression of a closed, strange and unexpected person in her manifestations, but, most likely, you are mistaken when you assume that “spiritual practice” is closer to her than living other people, and you are afraid of “going into your inner world". Most likely, your girlfriend is no more "oriented to deeply internal criteria" than a child of 10-15 years old - rather, on the contrary. Agree that for a 33-year-old woman (and with a higher education) a childish view of the world creates certain problems, in particular, as you rightly write, problems of (equal) communication. And the greatest danger for your girlfriend is the “bad company”.
Apparently, it should not be oriented towards reflection and moral issues. It will be more useful to help establish more productive and regular contacts with others, especially with peers of the opposite sex, perhaps at first even with psychological peers, boys of 17-18 years old, to try to remove unjustified emotional extremism caused by a lack of communication and healthy emotional relaxation. Moreover, as you rightly point out, “social and conventional norms are not the motivating beginning of behavior and life” of your girlfriend, “although she knows about them, knows that she often violates them, but she considers herself right and is not going to do anything. change".
If you plan to involve a specialist in solving your girlfriend's problems, then a family therapist and / or a sexologist seems to be more suitable here. In Samara, where you live, you can contact ....
TOPIC: Psychological portrait of a person
Introduction
To the question of what a person is, different experts answer differently. It is in the diversity of their answers, and, consequently, in the difference of opinions on this matter, that the complexity of the very phenomenon of personality is manifested.
Almost all theories of personality are based on the assumption that personality as a socio-psychological phenomenon is a vitally stable formation in its main manifestations. The stability of a person characterizes the sequence of her actions and the predictability of her behavior, gives her actions a natural character.
The concept of "personality" usually includes such properties that are more or less stable and testify to the individuality of a person, determining his actions that are significant for people. The feeling of stability of the personality is an important condition for the internal well-being of a person and the establishment of normal relationships with other people. If in some manifestations essential for communication with people the personality would not be relatively stable, then it would be difficult for people to interact with each other, to achieve mutual understanding: after all, each time they would have to re-adjust to the person, and would not be able to predict his behavior.
Based on these premises, it became possible description the main personality traits, drawing up a psychological portrait of a person. And this, in turn, opens up opportunities for its systematic study, the study of manifestations of behavior in various life situations, and the conduct of psycho-correctional work, in the case when such a need arises.
1. A variety of approaches to the definition of personality
The main problems of personality psychology at the initial - philosophical and literary stage of its study were questions about the moral and social nature of a person, about his actions and behavior. The first definitions of personality, given by such representatives of ancient thought as Aristotle, Plato and Democritus, were quite broad. They included everything that is in a person and that he can call his own, personal: his biology, psychology, property, behavior, culture, etc. This interpretation of personality has its grounds. After all, if we recognize that personality is a concept that characterizes a person and his actions as a whole, then everything that belongs to a person or concerns him should be attributed to him.
During the clinical period of personality study, the specialists focused on specific features that are moderately expressed in almost all people, but are especially pronounced in a sick person. This definition in itself was correct for solving psychotherapeutic problems, but it was too narrow for a holistic description of a normal personality. It did not include, for example, such personality traits as decency, conscience, honesty, and a number of others.
The experimental period in the study of personality is associated primarily with the names of G. Eysenck and R. Cattell, and in Russia with the name of A.F. Lazursky. These scientists developed a technique and methodology for conducting systematic observations and an experimental procedure in which it was possible to obtain and generalize data relating to the psychology and behavior of a healthy person. As a result of this, a theory was laid down, called the "theory of traits", in which real-life factors, or personality traits, were identified, described and defined.
As a result of the active differentiation of research areas, by the second half of the twentieth century, personality psychology developed a large number of various approaches and theories of personality. These include: psychodynamic theories that describe a personality and explain its behavior based on its internal, subjective characteristics; sociodynamic, in which the main role in the determination of behavior is assigned to the external situation; interactionist - theories based on the principle of interaction of internal and external factors in the management of actual human actions. Each of the theories of personality described in the literature and supported by practical research deserves to be taken into account and used in the search for the most complete definition of personality.
The word "personality", like many other psychological concepts, is widely used today in everyday communication. However, when using this term, no strict distinction is usually made with the concepts of "man", "individual", "individuality". Some psychologists believe that any adult is a person. According to K.K. Platonov, a person is a concrete person or a subject of the transformation of the world on the basis of his knowledge, experience and attitude towards him. With this approach, the question of the difference between the individual and the personality is practically removed. By definition, A.V. Petrovsky, personality in psychology denotes a systemic quality acquired by an individual in objective activity and communication and characterizing the degree of representation of social relations.
In our opinion, the definition given by R.S. Nemov: Personality is a person taken in the system of his psychological characteristics that are socially conditioned, manifested in social connections and relations by nature, are stable, determine the moral actions of a person that are essential for himself and those around him.
2. The concept of a psychological portrait of a person
Approaches to the structure of personality in different theories are different. In the theory of Z. Freud, this is the unconscious, consciousness, and superconscious. In social learning theory, these are abilities, cognitive strategies, expectations, values, and plans of behavior. Some theories deny the existence of a stable personality structure. Most researchers studying this phenomenon include in the personality structure: abilities, temperament, character, volitional qualities, emotions, motivations, social attitudes.
Abilities are understood as individually stable properties of a person that determine his success in various activities. Temperament includes the qualities on which a person's reactions to other people and social circumstances depend. Character contains qualities that determine a person's actions in relation to other people. Volitional qualities cover several special personal properties that affect a person's desire to achieve their goals. Emotions and motivation are, respectively, experiences and motivations for activity, and social attitudes are beliefs and attitudes of people. These concepts are relatively constant in a person and in their totality represent a psychological portrait of a person.
Some researchers (Kudryashova S.V., Yunina E.A.) offer a slightly different idea of the psychological portrait of a person.
They include in it:
1) socio-demographic characteristics (gender, age, education, occupation);
2) socio-psychological characteristics (needs, motives, attitudes towards others, levels of understanding);
3) individual-personal (attention, memory, type of thinking, psychosomatic type or temperament).
Consider the psychological portrait of a person on a specific example.
3. Drawing up a psychological portrait on a specific example
Become a Compilation Tester psychological portrait personality agreed to be Alexander B., a young man of 25 years. He has a higher education in management and currently works as a sales representative of one of the commercial firms in Novosibirsk. The psychological portrait was compiled after several conversations with Alexander and his colleagues and testing with a 16-factor Cattell personality questionnaire.
Alexander is distinguished by high growth, normal physique. Has the ability to last physical stress. According to him, he loves to walk with a fast, wide step, which is probably due to professional necessity. All his movements are well coordinated, fast and precise.
Alexander's facial expressions can be called somewhat monotonous, but at the same time quite expressive, always corresponding to experiences. He has a casual smile. Gesticulation, like the rest of his movements, is more expressive and lively than facial expressions. All his movements are very simple and natural. One of Alexander's favorite gestures is the "conducting" gesture. He likes to put his hand down, beat the beat with a short movement of the brush, stroke his head with his hand against the hair. When it comes to business, he often diligently suppresses his mental and emotional manifestations.
Alexander B. speaks very clearly and clearly, in a rather low voice, somewhat drawn out, very clearly, expressively, with good diction. According to him, at school he took part in amateur performances, which influenced his speech and voice, but he never had the desire to continue these studies more seriously.
Gymnastics and sports are not systematically involved. He likes to watch different games, but he rarely takes part in them. As a child, he loved games associated with risk - climbing steep, steep rocks or trees.
Strives for solitude, does not like noisy companies. Rather secretive - prefers not to express his thoughts openly and does not show his feelings. He speaks warmly about his friends, while noting that he had close friends at the institute, but now he does not often meet with them. When asked about the existence of a beloved girl, he answered that while he had not seriously fallen in love, there were only light hobbies.
In clothes, he has his own individual style, although he does not like cardinal changes - rather, he complements, deepens, improves what was previously developed.
The character is close to sanguine.
According to the data obtained as a result of testing according to the Cattell method, Alexander B. has the following character traits that are most developed in the personality structure: asceticism, nobility, conservatism, isolation, organization, practicality, adherence to principles, rationalism, self-sufficiency, restraint, cooperation, patience, purposefulness, honesty.
3.1. Positive trends
Alexander B. has a rational and practical mind. He is always calm and reserved. He likes to think and make plans about his future life, when drawing up these plans, career growth occupies a large place in them.
According to colleagues: Alexander is not petty, open and unsophisticated, responsible and reliable. Often shows nobility in responsible and difficult life situations, shows a firm grasp in business. He is distinguished by the efficiency and accuracy of the implementation of his plans. Plans, especially when it comes to work, almost always take a concrete, complete form. He has the patience and determination to overcome difficulties without the support of friends or family members. Unusually persistent, thorough, interested in details and specific procedures. Correct, steady and stable.
Alexander B. is distinguished by activity and adventurism, and gives the impression of a bold and resolute person, enterprising and self-confident, thinking independently.
He has adequate self-esteem, this is expressed in a sense of self-confidence, the presence of self-determination, an inner core. In behavior, this is manifested in activity, the desire to expand the field of one's activity, and the absence of fear of failure. Not afraid to take risky steps, take the initiative. He is quite independent in his views and desires. He speaks of more experienced colleagues with warmth and respect.
In relations with others, Alexander B. is dominated by the motive of cooperation, rationalism. He enjoys helping colleagues and friends. The healthy pragmatism inherent in him convinced him of the idea that in business the final result, visible, tangible and practical, is most important. He is caring for his immediate environment, knows how to convince of the validity of his actions and deeds.
3.2. Negative trends
On the basis of data on childhood addiction to risky games and entertainment, and a reluctance to take part in team games, it can be concluded that with a commitment to freedom in choosing activities, there is no need for cooperation with other people when it comes to hobbies and non-career activities.
Alexander takes his work seriously and thoroughly, he is inclined to do all the work from beginning to end himself, not trusting others. After the work is completed, it is important for him to find out the opinion of others about what has been done. We can say that Alexander needs recognition by others of the value of what he has done. Otherwise, he loses confidence in the importance and necessity of what he is doing, and in this case he may even lose interest in work. O is completely at a loss when people express dissatisfaction with his work.
It is very important for him to receive precise and comprehensive instructions from the management - he must know exactly when and what to do. In a situation of unpredictable developments in the future, and also if a lot of unplanned things have fallen on his head, he can easily develop a stressful state.
Consistency in everything, solidity, stability of aspirations, focus on the constant systematization of all accumulated experience and knowledge can be hypertrophied, and in turn lead to such character accentuation as pedantry.
He is constantly busy searching for the very best in life. Covered by ideas of self-improvement, although these ideas do not affect personal relationships, but mainly relate to his work and career development. This can lead to the devaluation of what Alexander has at the moment.
Alexander has a desire to help others, but his actions and deeds are sometimes intrusive. The desire to sacrifice oneself for the sake of others, but just when it is not only not necessary, but on the contrary, can be harmful.
Some ambition sometimes leads him to confrontation even with friends, can lead to tension in relations with colleagues. Alexander spoke about cases when he got into scandalous situations, while there was no fault of his in what happened.
Alexander B. is quite reserved when it comes to his relationships with loved ones and family members. It is difficult to create a trusting and emotionally warm atmosphere in dealing with him. It gives the impression of a person who is only interested in those areas of activity that will lead him to professional success and career growth.
4. Ways to correct unwanted personality traits
For a person who has psychological features First of all, it can be recommended to attend socio-psychological trainings, such as, for example, team building trainings, communication skills and skills.
This will allow: to expand the possibilities of establishing contact in various situations of communication; develop the skills of understanding other people, yourself, as well as relationships between people; activate the processes of self-knowledge and self-actualization; expand the range of their creative abilities.
From the description of the psychological portrait, it can be seen that Alexander B. pays little attention to communication with loved ones, there is no mention of the existence of close friends or a girlfriend at the moment. It is also difficult for him to take into account the dynamics of interpersonal relationships in his behavior. In this case, you can recommend attending trainings in interpersonal relations.
Individual work with a psychologist can also give good results. The unwillingness of Alexander B. to talk about his relationships with loved ones, about family members, the lack of serious hobbies for people of the opposite sex suggests that in this case there may be a certain internal conflict, the resolution of which will give energy, opportunities and desire for further development and self-actualization of the personality .
Conclusion
Thus, in this work, we in general terms considered approaches to such a multifaceted concept as the concept of “personality”, made an attempt to describe and analyze the psychological portrait of a person.
Given all of the above, we can say that the personality of a person is one of the most complex categories, and the problem of studying it is an area in which, despite the long period of study (from antiquity to the present day), there are more questions than answers.
However, the currently available theories and methods for studying personality make it possible to single out certain stable constructs for describing the most characteristic features. This gives us the opportunity to speak of a personality as a peculiar set of psychophysiological traits that are formed in vivo, which determine the thinking and behavior peculiar to a given person, on the one hand, and on the other hand, allows us to comprehend the manifestation of these traits and the search for forms and methods of psycho-correctional work, if necessary. their applications.
Personal development is the recognition and realization of the unique capabilities that each person has. The wider, more diverse the types of activities in which the personality is included, the more developed and streamlined they are, the richer the personality itself.
Bibliographic list
Gippenreiter Yu.B. Introduction to general psychology. Lecture course. / Personality and its formation. - M., Nauka, 1988. - P. 281-310.
Kudryashova S.V. Yunina E.A. Psychology: teaching materials for independent work of students: Part 1, 2. - Perm: Publishing house PRIPIT, 2002. - 258 p.
Meili R. Factor analysis of personality. // Psychology of individual differences: Texts. - M. Nauka, 1982. - 407 p.
Nemov R.S. Psychology. Book 1. General foundations of psychology. - M: Humanite. ed. center VLADOS, 2001. - 688 p.
Petrovsky A.V. Personality. Activity. Collective. - M: Nauka, 1982. - 643 p.
Radugin A.A. Psychology. / The concept and structure of "personality". - M: Publishing House CENTER, 2001. - 400 p.
DOCTOR 2.1 Emotional-value ... psychological characteristics personalities suicides through psychological and linguistic analysis... Coursework >> Psychology
Psychology in compiling psychological portrait personalities written texts CHAPTER 2: COMPILATION PSYCHOLOGICAL PORTRAIT PERSONALITIES SUICIDENT 2.1 Components of analysis...
Psychological analysis of the personality portrait
psychological personality questionnaire emotional
Watching other people, how they work, study, experience joys and sorrows, we often pay attention to the differences in their behavior. After all, everyone grew up and was brought up in different families, in different conditions, that is, in a different social environment. All this directly affects how a person will be in his adult life, how he will build his relationships with other people, what character traits he will have .... Based on observations of people, having some knowledge of psychology, we can make a psychological analysis of the portrait of a person. It is very useful to draw up such an analysis in order to successfully manage people, to make it easier to find relationships with them. mutual language know their strengths and weaknesses.
Starting the psychological analysis of the personality, let us find out, first of all, what he will be like. Usually, the personality structure includes: temperament, character, volitional qualities, abilities, emotions. These concepts are relatively constant in a person and in their totality represent a psychological portrait of a person. According to these criteria, I will conduct my psychological analysis.
In my work, I will conduct a psychological analysis of my friend Christina. Her age is 23 years old. She has a higher education with a degree in jurisprudence. Currently works in a firm that provides notarial and legal services to the public. Christina also graduated music school, piano department. At the moment, he continues to make music.
We now turn directly to psychological analysis. Let's talk about temperament first. In order to more accurately determine Christina's temperament, I suggested that she take the Jung questionnaire. The results showed that she is an ambivert, that is, she combines the traits of both an extrovert and an introvert. This suggests that big problems she does not feel in communication, but lightness in it is not characteristic of her either. For example, if Christina finds herself in a situation where you need to show organizational skills (when working in groups on seminars, at any events, etc.), then in most cases she will not show her initiative. In contrast to this, I can make the following argument: Christina has many friends, it is pleasant and interesting to communicate with her, everyone treats her well and respects her, getting into society, she looks sociable. But in this communication she does not have a special need. She likes to spend time alone with herself, she rarely meets with friends. This suggests that she combines the features of both an introvert and an extrovert. It can also be said about Christina that she takes risks only if it is justified. For example, there was such a situation in her life: speaking at a conference on English language, the teacher promised to put the final grade for the semester automatically. Christina understood that it was difficult to learn all the tickets, it was better to overcome her fear and insecurity and speak at the conference, as a result, she spoke and received an automatic five. In this situation, she did so because she understood that it was worth it, her risk would be justified. But when she is offered to participate in debates or discussions, just for the sake of expressing her point of view, she often refuses. This once again confirms that Christina is an ambivert. The test results exactly matched what Christina really is, I confirmed this with examples from her life.
Christina also passed the Eysenck questionnaire to determine temperament. The result of the questionnaire showed that she belongs to such a personality type as a phlegmatic. This is manifested in the fact that she has stable aspirations and moods. It has a strong, balanced, efficient nervous system. Christina is very hardworking, loves to bring everything she has started to the end. Her facial expressions, speech, movements are calm, to some extent even slow. She also has difficulty switching from one job to another and does not adapt well to a new environment. I will confirm these provisions with examples from the life of Christina. She can work from morning until night, until she completes all the work that she has planned, or that needs to be completed on time. It often happens that Christina works seven days a week. At the same time, she always has the patience to bring everything to the end. But at the same time, Christina can only work successfully in her usual environment. For example, when she changed jobs, at first it was very difficult for her. Outwardly, it was noticeably small, but internally she felt discomfort, although she tried to fight it in order to quickly get used to the new team and the new workplace. She also finds it difficult to switch from one activity to another. For example, when she finishes working with clients, it is difficult for her to switch to working with documentation, she swings for a long time. All this confirms that Christina is a phlegmatic.
I will now move on to describe Christina's character. Taking as a basis the criterion of attitude to life, we can say that she is an optimist. Always knows how to find in events and people bright sides. She loves her life and the people around her. Christina rarely gets discouraged, even if she has some kind of trouble. In such cases, she simply tries not to think about the bad, and sets herself up for the fact that all this is temporary, all bad things pass. In her opinion, despondency is not a completely constructive emotion. Thanks to this character trait, Christina always moves towards her goals and achieves them no matter what. Last year, she took part in the Star Trek competition, people took part in it. different ages where they showed their talents. In this competition, Christina performed a song. But then she failed to take the prize. Drawing a conclusion from this situation, she realized that she just needed to better prepare for the competition and confidently go after victory, at that moment, according to her, she was not at all upset, but on the contrary, she was glad that she had room to grow and something to strive for . Even this situation from her life suggests that Christina is an optimistic type of people.
Also, describing the character, I can say that Christina is very disciplined. This character trait is manifested in her life everywhere. For example, that she is punctual. If he makes an appointment with someone, he always arrives on time, often even in advance. In order to do his job more successfully, he draws up an action plan that he strictly adheres to. Given today's pace of life, it is very difficult to stick to the daily routine, but Christina manages to do it to some extent. She tries to eat at the same time, goes to bed on time if possible, does exercises in the morning, in other words, leads healthy lifestyle life. Christina keeps herself within tight limits, beyond which she tries not to overstep.
If we consider Christina's character from the point of view of her attitude to other people, to the team, to society, then we can say that she belongs to the individualistic type of people. This is manifested in the fact that she prefers individual work to work in groups. Relies only on himself, does not like to ask people for anything. She tries to do everything herself, she hopes only for herself. Such a trait has been present in Christina's character since childhood, I think that the reason for this lies in her upbringing. Parents always encouraged manifestations of independence, which developed such a character trait in her.
Describing Christina's character from the point of view of her attitude towards herself, I can say that she is self-critical. Adequately evaluates himself and his actions. He sees his own mistakes and, if possible, tries to correct them. He works hard on his shortcomings and complexes. For example, most recently, Christina took a training course on "How to become a self-confident person." This suggests that she sees her shortcoming, which needs to be fought, and is trying to eradicate it. When something does not work out for her, she blames herself, first of all, for this, and not circumstances and other people, she tries to understand what her mistake is. I already gave an example about her participation in the Star Trek competition. Then, she concluded that she needed to work more on herself, grow spiritually and professionally, and did not blame the jury or any circumstances for her defeat. All this confirms that Christina is very self-critical.
Analyzing the character and temperament of Christina, I also used E. Kretschmer's personality typology, according to which the temperament and character of a person depends on the physique. According to this theory, Christina belongs to such a type as an asthenic, since she has a thin physique, long arms and legs, a flat chest and weak muscles. This type of personality corresponds to such a type of character as schizotimic. This suggests that Christina is closed, serious, stubborn, it is difficult to adapt to new conditions. So it is, this description is fully consistent with Christina. The presence of these character traits I argued above.
Now let's move on to the analysis of Christina's abilities. Since childhood, she dreamed of playing the piano, she constantly sang and arranged concerts for her parents at home with her girlfriends. All this testified to her musicality. When she was 6 years old, she entered the music school, the piano department. Upon admission, it was necessary to pass exams, where musical ear was tested. Christina did well on her exam. During the training, she almost never had problems, teachers praised her. Christina often took part in various music competitions and is still doing it, often in such competitions she won. Today, she continues to develop her musical abilities, is engaged in music.
And now I want to turn to the analysis of Christina's volitional qualities. Taking this criterion as a basis, I can say that Christina is a strong-willed person, that is, a person with a strong will. This is manifested in the fact that, starting any work, setting a goal or fulfilling a plan, Christina knows how to overcome difficulties and failures, both internal and external. This is evidenced by the fact that Christina can spend time at work from morning to night, and sometimes even work seven days a week. Despite the fact that in the course of this work she is accompanied by many difficulties, such as fatigue and the need for precision in work. Also, her behavior in most cases is quite responsible. You can rely on her in a difficult situation, she will never let you down.
Now I will move on to describe Christina's emotionality. At different types People express their emotions in different ways. Since Christina belongs to such a type of person as a phlegmatic, it can be judged that she seems impregnable to other people, to some extent mysterious. Her emotional state is in perfect balance. Most often, Christina restrains her emotions or shows them weakly. And all this is true. Christina is very difficult to piss off. She is very patient. I once witnessed when, while riding on a bus, she accidentally stepped on the foot of a person standing next to her. young man, he answered something rudely to her, but Christina simply calmly apologized and continued to talk to me just as naturally. This indicates that she keeps her emotions to herself, behaves with restraint. But such restraint of emotions interferes with her performances, where emotionality is needed. Christina has to work hard on this, and this allows her to achieve success.
Conducting a psychological analysis, I talked a lot with Christina, asked her various questions, and conducted tests. This helped me to better characterize her personality, to identify some features. Such analyzes are very useful, as you begin to better understand people and the reasons for their actions.
Knowledge of what psychological portrait of a person, his personality, plays an important role in choosing a profession; business partner and, importantly, in a harmonious, compatible married life and raising children.
Greetings to all who read the psychological articles of the psychoanalyst Oleg Matveev, I wish you mental health.
In psychological portraits of personalities, three types of people are distinguished:
1. - with a focus on the present moment and easy adaptation to the situation. These people are better at making decisions.
2. - with a focus on the past, able to act within the framework of permissions and prohibitions, rights and obligations. This type better implements these solutions.
3. - with a focus on the future, with inadequate situational behavior, poorly adapted to the vertical of power in the team. People of this type are better realized as a generator of ideas.
Composing psychological portrait of a person's personality, you need to learn to know yourself and other people, to identify temperament, character, personality orientation, attitude to activity and life, to goals and life situations, expected emotional behavior in stressful situations and interpersonal relationships, business qualities.
(change of character)
Each person is an individuality, in each individuality the basic and programming properties of the personality are distinguished.
The basic ones are: temperament, character, abilities. Through them, emotionality, the pace of reactions, dynamism, sensitivity, and activity are revealed.
To programmers- orientation, intelligence, self-awareness.
Based on the properties of individuality, a psychological portrait of a person’s personality is compiled.
Some are fast, impetuous, mobile, prone to violent emotional reactions, others are slow, calm, unperturbed, with imperceptibly expressed feelings, etc. The reason for such differences lies in the temperament of a person inherent in him from birth.
I wish you all psychological well-being!
Each person has the skill of adapting to the current situation, but everyone does it in their own way. There are many options for behavior. The psychological portrait of a person is an example of how, using a description of a person’s character traits, one can predict his actions and reactions. It is extremely useful when applying for a job, entering a educational establishments And so on.
Over time, it turned out that she was indeed called Sh. And her name came up to say that he had aristocratic roots. In one of the trials, however, the secretary was believed to have nothing to do with the services, and the psychologist expert said he might have delusions.
Krzysztof Kwiatkowski said that in one of the first classes high school he entered the Polish Socialist Youth Association, quotes a letter from Kaczynski, the author of the book, but Kaczynski did not change his mind. A similar fate met the longtime driver of Pis Tadeusz Kopczyński.
The psychological portrait of a personality is an example of a qualitative textual interpretation of a person's characteristics. Its compilation is one of the most complex and important tasks of modern psychology.
The psychological portrait of the child helps the educator and teacher to find an individual approach to each pupil. Identification of the characteristic features of each baby will allow you to correctly build the process of development and education.
He interrupted the most important meetings to get his phone back. He didn't want her to worry about something happening to him. The priority for both Kaczynski brothers was her health, with which she almost always had problems. Contrary to popular belief, every day he reaches alcohol no less than average person. He likes beer, he also likes wine and sometimes whiskey. A few weeks after Jarosław Kaczynski became prime minister, the post was lost by Colonel Damian Jakubowski, head of the Office of State Protection.
A psychological portrait of a person is often compiled when applying for a job. With its help, managers will be better able to organize the activities of personnel in the company, increase the efficiency and success of each member of the team.
The psychological portraits of criminals differ from the characteristics of law-abiding citizens, since they are characterized by emotional-volitional deformations, criminal motives and negative social interests. The problem of the identity of swindlers and murderers is central to forensics and other sciences that are associated with crime. Psychological portraits of criminals help the investigator to understand the motives of the committed illegal act.
There was no official reason for his departure. Lech Kaczynski summoned the head of his defense to Krzysztof Olszowicz and sent him to Loliborz. Krzyseyk got into the car, bombed on the roof and fired. It turned out that this was not good for her mother and she needed to be taken to the Shamir hospital.
Olshovets complained to the president, he called his brother, and Yakubovsky cut off his head. They have always been very close, and after graduation, their paths parted a bit. Lech went to work in Tri-City. If he had been in Warsaw, his life would probably have been different. He asked his colleagues to order post-mortem cosmetic surgery. He also decided to transfer his brother's body from the Russian coffin. He put three very personal items in the new twin, but he didn't betray what it was.
How many people, so many personalities, because each person is an individuality. Let us briefly consider the main components that make up the psychological portrait of a person.
Watching people in different situations, you can always notice differences in their behavior and lifestyle. This is due to the temperament of the person under observation. So, temperament is one of the main factors on which a psychological portrait is built.
When the idea came to bury the president in Wawel, Jarosław Kaczynski objected. I want Leszek closer, - his colleagues said. In the end, however, he considered Krakow a worthy place for his brother's burial, and in Warsaw Poazkoy he created a symbolic tomb, which he often visited.
Of the two brothers, Lech wanted to go to parties with friends more. In memory of his friends, the day of the election of Lech Walesa to the presidency especially fell in memory. The girls are dancing on the editor's desk, and Yaroslav goes to the bowler hat with the words "Sex instructor".
Modern psychology under "temperament" understands the characteristics of the nervous system and the psyche of the individual. This is not only the rhythm, pace and intensity of the psychological process, but also its content. Temperament is the biological foundation of personality. These characteristics are inherited, which is why they are difficult to change. The psychological portrait of a person should reflect the main features of a person's temperament: the style of his behavior, ways to help him organize his activities, and so on.
The first lesson is free. His mother said in an interview that she is a musicologist. Opposite was the girl's father. She later married, gave birth to another man, and became a professor. For many years, Yaroslav talked about this lightly and without emotion, but Mrs. Yadviga told me that the president, despite his appearance, was sensitive and affectionate.
And it was a great love that ended in a painful separation, says a longtime collaborator of Yaroslav Kaczynski in the book. In conversations with friends, he was surprised to find a family, limiting the time needed to resolve party affairs. At first he agreed, but the day before the program he resigned. The pants convinced him to go to the studio. In the evening Pis Elbbieta Yakubiak and Joanna Klyuzik-Rostovskaya entered his house. There is nothing to talk about here.
Based on certain psychological principles, you can find your own approach to the carrier of each of the four types of temperament.
Motto: trust but verify!
The advantages of this type of temperament are cheerfulness, sociability, enthusiasm and responsiveness, and the disadvantages are dispersion, over-sociality, frivolity, a tendency to arrogance, superficiality and unreliability. The psychological portrait of a person marked "sanguine" is as follows: an individual is always happy to promise something so as not to offend the petitioner, but he does not always keep his word, so you should check whether he fulfilled the promise.
Defensive personality, behavior outside the rules, increased conformity. Daniel David, founder of the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy. Babesh-Bolaya, is trying to rebuild the work of Motru - "Psychology of the Romanian people". Using international psychological tests, adapted to the Romanian population, Daniel David discovered, among other things, that the main feature of the Romans is distrust of people, and that concern for the welfare of others does not go beyond the family.
How and why we came to this. The psychological profile of the surface is in some not fully developed segments, not expressing the potential that we have. From a psychocultural point of view, Romanians are looking for social power, but hypocritically, according to the collectivist culture, in which it is not good to want to get out of control, they hide this desire under the guise of modesty and sacrifice for others.
Motto: Not a minute of rest!
The principle of communication with a choleric person is based on the use of its advantages: enthusiasm, mobility, energy, passion and purposefulness. At the same time, it neutralizes the disadvantages of this type of temperament: aggressiveness, intolerance, incontinence, conflict. A psychological portrait with the characteristic "choleric" should suggest that a person should always be busy with some business. Otherwise, he will direct all his energy and activity to the team and can decompose it from the inside.
The exercise of power is then carried out in a female paradigm characterized by debate and consensus-seeking. Quantitative culture is characterized by distrust of foreigners, distrust of the Romans, reinforced by a low level of self-determination and civic spirit, as we have said, summarized in chronic distrust, including acquaintances. Romanian culture promotes heterodification, at the expense of self-determination and pragmatism, to the detriment of civic spirit.
Romanians have a repressive and shunned cultural style that makes them defensive. Romanians score lower on values such as universalism, benevolence, hedonism, stimulation, and self-determination, but it seems that in order to make a good impression, they may present themselves as giving value to these values.
Motto: Don't rush!
Among the strengths of the phlegmatic are constancy, patience, activity, stability, reliability and self-control. Cons - it's indifference, dryness, slowness and "thick skin". The psychological portrait of a person marked “phlegmatic” means that he cannot work if time is in short supply, as he needs his own individual pace: you don’t need to adjust it, he himself will draw up a work schedule and do everything on time.
It is very interesting that in the Romans universalism is secondary to benevolence, which means that concern for the welfare of others does not exceed the family domain in Romans and sometimes reaches its maximum for people they know. This shows an egotistical individualism that does not contradict collectivism, but can be justified in very concrete forms; against collectivism - benevolent and universalist individualism.
But the Romans have high marks in achievement, power and conformity. Interestingly, the assessments of traditions and safety today are at an average level. Probably the tradition is now seen as a necessity, the Romans are ready to give up if it is no longer useful, or if something is even better.
Motto: Do no harm!
The psychological portrait marked "melancholic" is as follows: the strengths of the personality are gentleness, the ability to sympathize, humanity, high sensitivity and benevolence. The disadvantages of this type of temperament are suspiciousness, shyness, low efficiency, isolation, daydreaming and vulnerability. Never shout at a melancholic, do not put pressure on him, do not give harsh and harsh instructions, as this person is extremely sensitive to intonations and is too vulnerable.
Autonomy has an interesting status for the Romans. When evaluated as an opinion, the Romans consider themselves as autonomous as the Americans and the Turks; Chinese, Germans and Spaniards feel most autonomous, while Russians and Ukrainians feel least autonomous. When evaluated as a ratio, the autonomy of Romanians is lower.
The relationship of the Romans with religion is very interesting. Indeed, the Romanians have high level religiosity and consider religion very important in their lives. Although they are very confident in scientific development, if science clashes with religion, 2% of Romanians choose religion. How can we be?
It is very difficult to find an individual who would fully meet a certain temperament, usually there is a dominant of one of them.
Intelligence is a system of mental processes that ensures the realization of a person's ability to assess the current situation, make decisions and regulate their behavior in accordance with this. As a rule, intelligence is important if the situation is non-standard - as a symbol of the individual's learning everything new.
It is a big disagreement that the socio-cultural environment in the country does not allow us to express and benefit from the potential that we have in the psychological profile of the surface; Romans often have to go to countries that are doing well and doing well with the good potential they have.
How we think we are and why we think so. Personality is considered positive, humorous, compensating for more negative behaviors that we contextualize, defining them not as stable, but as situational. Subcategory 3 of this refers to how others think we are. This approach generates mostly heterostereotypes towards the Romans. There are few rigorous studies of this kind with reference to the Romans. Interestingly, part of the lack of consciousness in the heterostereotypes towards the Romans is also recognized in the autostereotypes of the Romanians.
Jean Piaget is a psychologist from France, one of the most important functions intelligence called interaction with the outside world through adaptation to it. Or, in other words, the ability to navigate the conditions and expediently build one's behavior.
The core of the intellect is the ability of a person to single out the main properties in a situation and build his behavior in accordance with them. The Soviet psychologist S. L. Rubinshtein in his works considered this category as a type of personality behavior - “smart behavior”.
Another subcategory of this item refers to how we think there are others. Since the Romanians see others: the Chinese are patriots, honest, workers, smart; The Germans are workers, honest, smart. The Romans prefer the British, Americans and French, then the Germans, and then the Hungarians and Russians.
How we want to be. He enters a vicious circle that keeps us in a protective state. The good news is that although Romanians are "considered" "not as they are", they are "considered" "as they can be". That is why, in the case of the Romans, there is big chance for development and evolution towards an ideal psychocultural model. What should this ideal psychocultural model look like? Simply put, to create intelligent, creative, socially adaptable citizens with extensive declarative and procedural baggage with a personality that supports prosocial behavior.
Character is a set of individual characteristics of a person, which are formed and manifested in communication and activity. The psychological portrait of a person is an example of how the identified character traits help determine her typical behaviors.
Character traits are called stable properties and qualities of human behavior that have become the properties of the personality itself. A psychological portrait is an example of displaying the most typical and essential features of a human character.
All this will then be able to support good mental and physical health, which will positively affect the increase in life expectancy and happiness. The development of this psychological component can be part of a country project, according to which Romania is not only a country that has joined the European space, but is also well integrated in this space.
Any psychological profile of people contains a dose of statistical generalization, and therefore it can only capture a modal profile, and not every person within people. Psychological negative profile, characterized by the following aspects: affective instability, decreased autonomy, resistance to change, suspicion and envy, lack of discipline.
Its structure includes 4 groups of traits that express the attitude of the individual to various aspects of activity: to himself, to work, to society and the team, as well as to things.
Communication is an extremely delicate and subtle process of interaction between people. It is in it that each participant in the process is most multifaceted, therefore this characteristic is extremely important for such an interpretation of the personality as a psychological portrait.
Of course, the long-term surface profile can be assimilated over time in the depth profile, the psychologist explained. Analyzed in terms of classical psychological models, the psychological depth profile of the Romanian people compared to the American people is indicative in the following way: extraversion is higher in Romanian than in Americans when assessed by others, but not significantly different statistically when it comes to self-assessment.
The Romanian people will be happy and respected for more than 20 years. One of the conclusions of the study, explained by psychologist Daniel David, is that when the psychological profile of the surface does not look very good, because the lack of potential depth of the profile, but the psychosocial context is not conducive to the expression of this potential way in the profile of the surface, in everyday life.
An example of the most obvious function of communication is the transfer of information: any information, content and meaning. This side of communication is called semantic or semantic. The transmission has an impact on a person's behavior, his actions and actions, as well as on the organization and state of his inner world.
Therefore, many Romanians perform outside the country, where the socio-cultural environment helps them to express their potential in the depth profile in positive aspects at the surface level. Thus, the Romanian education system is not sufficiently supported to assess the intellectual potential of the youth in the country, which is assessed as soon as they reach the well-organized, well-organized and funded education system in other countries, David explained.
I don't think that the Romanian people have, in particular, qualities or shortcomings. Of course, at some point we can create an image, let's say a picture of synthesis, which is an image of a historical moment. So, not innate, final, permanent qualities, but qualities or defects that history produces.
In general, information, control, cognitive functions of communication are distinguished, in addition, there is an exchange function mental states and emotions.
Since the time of the ancient Greek thinker Plato, the entire mental life of a person has been divided into three relatively independent units: mind, will and emotions.
If the will and the mind are subordinate to a person at least to some extent, then emotions always arise regardless of our desire. This is a reflection of personal significance and assessment of situations for the process of human life in the form of feelings and experiences. This is where the subjectivity and involuntariness of emotions manifest themselves. The ability to manage emotions is necessary first of all for health and ambition.
What does it mean to be able to manage emotions? Most often, this statement means hiding them. It hurts, but we won’t show it, we’re ashamed, but we pretend that we don’t care, it’s insulting, but outwardly we will demonstrate only irritation and anger. But from the fact that a person does not show his emotions, they do not become weaker, rather the opposite, or take the form of protection - aggression.
A psychological portrait of a person is an example of a description of a person’s inner warehouse, which includes such a characteristic as abilities.
In psychology, abilities are considered as a special property of a psychological system, which is expressed in a certain level of its productivity. Accuracy, stability and speed of functioning are quantitative parameters of the productivity of abilities. They are measured by solving problems of a certain degree of complexity, resolving conflicts, etc.
The degree of resolvability of contradictions between the relationship of the individual and the properties of the individual is the level of abilities. Most good option- when there is a penchant for a certain field of activity, coupled with an interest in this business.
Abilities are divided into special and general. General can predetermine a tendency to a rather extensive field of activity. They are formed by the development of intelligence and personality traits. The special one acts as a socio-psychological basis for the development of craving for a certain field of activity: research, music, teaching, creative, etc.
Self-esteem expresses a certain emotional and value attitude towards oneself, which a person has developed on the basis of self-knowledge. A psychological portrait is an example of how a person's self-esteem affects all areas of life, because it involves assessing one's own abilities, actions, goals, qualities and capabilities, as well as one's place in society. It is overpriced, underestimated and adequate.
Motivation of activity and behavior, satisfaction of needs - all this underlies the orientation of the individual (on a task, on oneself or on communication).
Some may be satisfied only with security and satisfaction of physiological needs. And for others, besides this, it is equally important to satisfy social needs, the need for self-expression, and also to realize their creative abilities. The main task of the manager and psychologist is to identify the needs, beliefs and interests of each individual and determine the direction of its motives.
Alexander B., a young man of 25, agreed to become a test subject for compiling a psychological portrait of a person. He has a higher education in management and currently works as a sales representative of one of the commercial firms in Novosibirsk. The psychological portrait was compiled after several conversations with Alexander and his colleagues and testing with a 16-factor Cattell personality questionnaire. Psychological portrait of personality sample analysis of a person's character.
Alexander is distinguished by high growth, normal physique. Has the ability to sustain physical exertion. According to him, he loves to walk with a fast, wide step, which is probably due to professional necessity. All his movements are well coordinated, fast and precise.
Alexander's facial expressions can be called somewhat monotonous, but at the same time quite expressive, always corresponding to experiences. He has a casual smile. Gesticulation, like the rest of his movements, is more expressive and lively than facial expressions. All his movements are very simple and natural. One of Alexander's favorite gestures is the "conducting" gesture. He likes to put his hand down, beat the beat with a short movement of the brush, stroke his head with his hand against the hair. When it comes to business, he often diligently suppresses his mental and emotional manifestations.
Alexander B. speaks very clearly and clearly, in a rather low voice, somewhat drawn out, very clearly, expressively, with good diction. According to him, at school he took part in amateur performances, which influenced his speech and voice, but he never had the desire to continue these studies more seriously.
Gymnastics and sports are not systematically involved. He likes to watch different games, but he rarely takes part in them. As a child, he loved games associated with risk - climbing steep, steep rocks or trees.
Strives for solitude, does not like noisy companies. Rather secretive - prefers not to express his thoughts openly and does not show his feelings. He speaks warmly about his friends, while noting that he had close friends at the institute, but now he does not often meet with them. When asked about the existence of a beloved girl, he answered that while he had not seriously fallen in love, there were only light hobbies.
In clothes, he has his own individual style, although he does not like cardinal changes - rather, he complements, deepens, improves what was previously developed.
The character is close to sanguine. In a word, an ideal sample for compiling psychological portrait of a person.
According to the data obtained as a result of testing according to the Cattell method, Alexander B. has the following character traits that are most developed in the personality structure: asceticism, nobility, conservatism, isolation, organization, practicality, adherence to principles, rationalism, self-sufficiency, restraint, cooperation, patience, purposefulness, honesty.
Below is a psychological portrait of a person an example of writing.
Alexander B. has a rational and practical mind. He is always calm and reserved. He likes to think and make plans about his future life, when drawing up these plans, career growth occupies a large place in them.
According to colleagues: Alexander is not petty, open and unsophisticated, responsible and reliable. Often shows nobility in responsible and difficult life situations, shows a firm grasp in business. He is distinguished by the efficiency and accuracy of the implementation of his plans. Plans, especially when it comes to work, almost always take a concrete, complete form. He has the patience and determination to overcome difficulties without the support of friends or family members. Unusually persistent, thorough, interested in details and specific procedures. Correct, steady and stable.
Alexander B. is distinguished by activity and adventurism, and gives the impression of a bold and resolute person, enterprising and self-confident, thinking independently.
He has adequate self-esteem, this is expressed in a sense of self-confidence, the presence of self-determination, an inner core. In behavior, this is manifested in activity, the desire to expand the field of one's activity, and the absence of fear of failure. Not afraid to take risky steps, take the initiative. He is quite independent in his views and desires. He speaks of more experienced colleagues with warmth and respect.
In relations with others, Alexander B. is dominated by the motive of cooperation, rationalism. He enjoys helping colleagues and friends. The healthy pragmatism inherent in him convinced him of the idea that in business the final result, visible, tangible and practical, is most important. He is caring for his immediate environment, knows how to convince of the validity of his actions and deeds.
On the basis of data on childhood addiction to risky games and entertainment, and a reluctance to take part in team games, it can be concluded that with a commitment to freedom in choosing activities, there is no need for cooperation with other people when it comes to hobbies and non-career activities.
Alexander takes his work seriously and thoroughly, he is inclined to do all the work from beginning to end himself, not trusting others. After the work is completed, it is important for him to find out the opinion of others about what has been done. We can say that Alexander needs recognition by others of the value of what he has done. Otherwise, he loses confidence in the importance and necessity of what he is doing, and in this case he may even lose interest in work. O is completely at a loss when people express dissatisfaction with his work.
It is very important for him to receive precise and comprehensive instructions from the management - he must know exactly when and what to do. In a situation of unpredictable developments in the future, and also if a lot of unplanned things have fallen on his head, he can easily develop a stressful state.
Consistency in everything, solidity, stability of aspirations, focus on the constant systematization of all accumulated experience and knowledge can be hypertrophied, and in turn lead to such character accentuation as pedantry.
He is constantly busy searching for the very best in life. He is obsessed with ideas of self-improvement, although these ideas do not affect personal relationships, but mainly concern his work and career development. This can lead to the devaluation of what Alexander has at the moment.
Alexander has a desire to help others, but his actions and deeds are sometimes intrusive. The desire to sacrifice oneself for the sake of others, but just when it is not only not necessary, but on the contrary, can be harmful.
Some ambition sometimes leads him to confrontation even with friends, can lead to tension in relations with colleagues. Alexander spoke about cases when he got into scandalous situations, while there was no fault of his in what happened.
Alexander B. is quite reserved when it comes to his relationships with loved ones and family members. It is difficult to create a trusting and emotionally warm atmosphere in dealing with him. It gives the impression of a person who is only interested in those areas of activity that will lead him to professional success and career growth.
For a person with such psychological characteristics, it can be recommended, first of all, to attend social and psychological trainings, such as, for example, team building trainings, trainings for the formation of communication skills.
This will allow: to expand the possibilities of establishing contact in various situations of communication; develop the skills of understanding other people, yourself, as well as relationships between people; activate the processes of self-knowledge and self-actualization; expand the range of their creative abilities.
From the description of a sample of a psychological portrait of a person, it can be seen that Alexander B. pays little attention to communication with loved ones, there is no mention of the existence of close friends or a girlfriend at the moment. It is also difficult for him to take into account the dynamics of interpersonal relationships in his behavior. In this case, you can recommend attending trainings in interpersonal relations.
Good results can be given with a psychologist. The unwillingness of Alexander B. to talk about his relationships with loved ones, about family members, the lack of serious hobbies for people of the opposite sex suggests that in this case there may be a certain internal conflict, the resolution of which will give energy, opportunities and desire for further development and self-actualization of the personality .
